Add this page to your Favorites


What is Astrology ?

 Robert Hand | Liz Greene | Nancy R. Fenn

Dane Rudyhar
The Responsibilities of Astrology
The Dangers of Astrology

 

Here are some interesting quotes about astrology by astrologers.

Robert Hand

"Essentially, astrology is a language and does not need scientific proofs to be effective. Therefore I would say that positive results in the scientific study of astrology have to be taken seriously, undeniably, but negative results not so seriously. I don't think that science is yet capable of dealing with the full complexity of the symbolic language as employed by astrologers." [ An Interview with Robert Hand by Francoise Gauguelin, NCGR Research Journal, 1989]


Liz Greene

"Any understanding of the language of astrology must commence with a realisation of what the birth horoscope can and cannot tell us. ... the birth map does not plot the fate of the individual in a predestined way. Rather, it symbolises the basic lines of his character's potential development.
br> A lot of people are frightened of astrology because they believe it claims to predict fate. Once upon a time, during the Middle Ages and the Renaissance, it claimed to do precisely that. But astrology as evolved since then, just as medicine has. We in the West - unlike India - don't like to think that there's any factor shaping our lives except ourselves and the tax collector.

"Astrology also suggest that the individual's temperament is inherent at birth, and an understanding of astrology may be of help in perceiving the nature of this seed which develops into the adult ego. It can not only tell us about the self we know, but also about the one we do not know.

"The horoscope describes a person's inner nature ... The more unaware they are of the stuff of which they're made, the more 'fated' they are by their own inner self. ... The more aware (or we might say conscious) they are, the more choices they have. ... This is the meaning of fate in astrology.

"Lately, there has been a good deal of public outcry from academia against astrology as well as from the scientific community at large; which has apparently got a little frightened by its popularity. ... but no matter how strenuously it's proclaimed that astrology is really a load of medieval superstitious nonsense, belief in it is spreading." [Liz Greene]

BACK TO THE TOP


Dane Rudyhar

"If the astrologer thinks he merely gives bits of information and then is through with the whole thing, he is greatly mistaken. He has established a relationship.

"When the astrologer interprets the birth-chart of his client and conveys to him the results, what he does - or can do - is to change to some extent the orientation of the client toward the basic foundations and possibilities of his life. Such a change of orientation can have far-reaching effects. ...

"The astrologer discussing the client's birth-chart is thus responsible for helping him to establish a new relationship between his conscious ego and the potentialities inherent in his total naturre. It is, or at least it can be, an enormous responsibility.... The client is almost totally unprotected ... Even if he reasons himself out of being consciously affected by the forecasts, his subconscious memory does not let go. This is worse obviously if the event or trend prophesied is unfortunate and if fear of its results is aroused - which is the case in nine cases out of ten! - but it can even have psychologically disintegrating effects when the thing expected is very fortunate, for it may lead to a self-satisfied expectancy blurring the edges of the individual's efforts.

"Whoever gives knowledge is to some extent responsible for the use to which it is put, especially if the use is most readily predictable in view of the character of the person (or the collectivity) to which it is given and of the circumstances in which the disclosure is made.

"Knowledge implies responsibility. The astrologer who practices this art must assume responsibility for the use of this knowledge. When the event-oriented astrologer approaches his work, he assumes little responsibility for the results his statements may have upon the psychological condition of his clients, concerning himself with the material success of his clients and the prediction of events, rather than the personal integration and self-actualization of those who seek his serivces." [Dane Rudyhar on the Responsibility of Astrologers.]

BACK TO THE TOP


Dane Rudyhar

"So-called critical aspects seem to bring to a person astrologically aware of them sharper and often more upsetting confrontations than they did before he knew about astrology. ... It may be that by establishing a conscious contact with his celestial Name (his birth-chart) the individual made himself more open to a downpour of the karma, held as it were in suspension in his unconscious, and more willing to accept it to the full without evasion. I would indeed tell any person who seeks proficiency in astrological knowledge: Are you ready and willing to meet up to the hilt your destiny? Are you really intent upon discovering your true Name? If not, leave astrology alone. It might only bring you confusion." [Dane Rudhyar]

BACK TO THE TOP


Nancy R. Fenn

"Astrology is the most elegant and flexible language I've found for discussing the creation of the universe." [Nancy R. Fenn]

Also visit ...

How Do Astrologers Think?
Why Take Astrology Seriously? (guest astrologer)
Why Aren't Astrologers Invited to the Peace Parties?


BACK TO THE TOP

Return to the Main Page